Law School Spotlight on: The Personal Statement – How They Help (or Hurt) Your Apps.
By: Bill Corwin - posted Oct 6th 2011 at 10:00 AM
This is a continuing series of blogs from our team of Admissions Consultants here at Kaplan Test Prep & Admissions, showcasing various facets of a candidate’s law school application. For the next few weeks, we’ll be focusing extensively on the personal statement. Click here for more information on Admissions Consulting from Kaplan, including our Personal Statement Review package.
Fortunately for you, most law school personal statements stink. Okay, “stink” may be over-the-top, but the more lawyerly “competitively ineffective” is definitely in the ballpark. But why “fortunately?”
Since you’re reading this blog, you’re obviously the pro-active sort and want to hone your edge in the mad competitive scramble that is law school admissions. Me too—that’s exactly my professional objective as well.
After 27 years of doing pre-law counseling and consulting, I’ve found an unsettling minority of law school personal statements actively harmful to the admissions chances to the well-meaning victims that wrote them. My Kaplan colleague Jesse writes his next blog on awful statements (“Worst of the Worst”), but for now I’ll highlight some of the common elements found in competitively sharp and persuasive documents. So, repeat after me…
STRONG PERSONAL STATEMENTS ARE:
1. Almost always anecdotal. The stories they tell are concise and relevant. Even better if they’re somehow law related. The absolute reciprocal is item # 5 below.
2. Able to offer a satisfying answer to the question, “So What?” If you tell a story about your charming grandfather, keep in mind that admissions committees want to evaluate how this relates to YOU. Maybe it simply because of the elegant way you wrote it, or maybe the his inspiration to YOU.
3. Without unsubstantiated characterizations. It’s no surprise that the lawyers or law-trained academics on your admissions committee love “evidence” (facts). For them, you can’t simply waltz into court, declare your client is innocent and then sit down. No characterization (“I have good communication skills…”) will survive the credibility test unless validated by some evidence (“I was a member of winning debate team…”). Show—don’t just tell.
4. Letter-perfect. Does this need to be said? When the history of the world is written, an incorrect usage of “there” and “their” does not loom large, but in your application it’s huge. Don’t give the admissions committee an easy way to ding you.
5. Not academic papers. In a persuasive and relevant personal statement, you should tell admissions committees things they DON’T know (probably centered about your own life experiences). For academic assignments involving research or analysis, naturally the professor knows a lot more about the subject than you do so don’t bore her with amateur stuff. An absolute corollary to this: NEVER presume to define what the law means to you or “society.” The legal professionals on your admissions committee will not be impressed.
6. Rarely “thought pieces” or creative writing exercises. Personally, I love reading off-beat or creative personal statement drafts—but they are VERY difficult to pull off successfully. Think about it. Your admissions committee members are mostly experienced academics and law faculty and they will tend to judge your statement on that level. Essays on Supreme Court decisions, simulated legal briefs, philosophical ruminations on the Rule of Law, controversial legal issues of the day, Shakespeare quotes (or any quotes for that matter) brings you in a face-to-face competition with experienced professionals. Unless your essay is drop-dead brilliant and original, you have selected a very difficult venue from which to impress the admissions committee.
7. Rarely humor pieces as an overall “theme.” I recall only one time in 27 years when a humorous theme was used successfully in a personal statement. He wrote a hilarious statement about his (legal) “card-counting” expertise which ultimately banned him from all the casinos in Atlantic City. He helped his candidacy because the statement was so well written, but why take the chance that your sense of humor and originality is shared with skeptical strangers. Think about it. Even if you’ve written a brilliant comedy routine, if the audience has heard it ten times before, it will fall flat.
8. Concise! Most applications postulate 2-4 page max statement lengths. For most of you, it’s contrary to those 16 years of institutional education you have as a college graduate. Note to the student mind-set: A 10 page paper is NOT twice as good as one of 5 pages!