What’s your stereotype, and how can you use it to your advantage?
By: Ben Baron - posted May 18th 2009 at 1:57 PMAdmissions officers pride themselves on their ability to evaluate each candidate on his and her individual merits. But it’s also true that candidates with similar professional and academic backgrounds tend to sound pretty darn similar in their applications.
Take engineers, for example. When we think about engineers, we generally assume certain strengths…good quantitative skills, highly analytical, and very detail oriented. You were thinking that too, right? But we also assume a number of weaker traits…poor communication skills, less leadership ability, weaker social comfort. I remember giving a presentation one night. When I asked the group to identify some negative stereotypes for engineers, someone in the back of the room said “geeky,” But I didn’t hear him clearly and thought he had said “kinky.” I’m not often speechless, but that comment had me stumped. But I digress.
Now knowing the established stereotype you, the engineer, are well armed to tip the scales in your favor. First, take full credit for all the positive things admissions officers will assume about you from the start (smart, analytical…) But then distance yourself from the perceived negative traits (by demonstrating your fine communication and leadership skills, etc.) This is a terrific way to distinguish yourself from other candidates with similar professional experience.
While it’s great fun to pick on engineers (go ahead, try it), we could go through the same exercise for any professional background. What’s important is that you understand your perceived strengths and weaknesses based on what you do, and then turn it to your advantage.